Sunday, February 25, 2007

Arched Bridges

It seems that arched suspension bridges over freeways are the latest thing. These bridges have large arches on each side of the bridge, anchored at the ends, and cables to suspend the surface of the span over the freeway. Here are some examples.



I took this first photo last October on northbound US 59, the Southwest Freeway in the museum district of Houston, not far from the downtown split. Even though the highway is northbound, it actually runs east and west here, so you are looking east. These bridges replaced older, standard bridges that used to cross the freeway at Hazard, Woodhead, Dunlavy, and Mandell. The old Hazard Street bridge was appropriately, though inadvertently named, since that bridge didn't have quite enough clearance for some 18-wheelers, and there were frequent trucks hitting the bridge and getting stuck under it. Part of the problem was that the freeway goes into a trench at Hazard, so the pavement was descending about where the bridge was.

This part of the Southwest Freeway is also a Texas rarity, as it is like freeways in most other places, in that it is lacking what Houstonians call "feeder streets", also known as frontage roads or service roads. The trench keeps the noise down for the residential community on the sides of the highway.

This stretch of the freeway was reconstructed in 2000-2001. For another view, CLICK HERE to see it on the texasfreeway.com web site.



Here is another example of a suspended arch overpass. This is in the Denver area. The big difference here is that despite the similarity to the design in Houston, these are pedestrian bridges rather than vehicular ones. They were recently completed as part of the TRex, or Transportation Expansion project that widened I-25 on the south side of the Denver metropolitan area, and added a light rail line. There is a series of these bridges south of I-225 to permit people to get across the freeway to the trains which run on the west side of the freeway; on the right side of this photo. The photo above is at the Belleview Station.

There is one of these bridges that is different than the others. That is the one near Park Meadows Mall. It is a double arch, and is in the photo below.

Given the similarity of the designs of the Denver and Houston bridges, it would be interesting to know if they had the same engineer, or if this is just a common design that is well known. Either way, I don't recall seeing this type of bridge over freeways anywhere else but in these two places.

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Hope They Don't Share an Oven!!

Here is something that I have always wondered about. On Broadway at Union Ave. in Englewood, Colorado, there are two businesses that are side by side. One of them is Frank The Pizza King. The other one stands right beside it, and you can see it's sign in this picture. I am hoping they don't share an oven! YIKES!!

Denver Public Art

Overnight here in Douglas County, we got several inches of snow. On Interstate 70 just south of Denver International Airport, the roads were so bad that it caused a 35-car pileup, and the highway is closed in both directions from there to Kansas. Weirdly enough, downtown Denver apparently got no new snow at all. Once the skies started clearing late this morning, I decided to go take some pictures. Here are a few of them.

First of all, let's take a look at the big blue bear, who spends his time peering into the windows of the Colorado Convention Center.

Do you wonder what he is looking at? Just inside the windows was this sign giving directions to an event being held there this weekend.

Next, let's go over to the area near the Capitol and the Denver public buildings. The Denver Museum of Art is located there in its striking new building. There is a piece of sculpture there that every one will recognize from daily life. It looks like it is the right size for the blue bear to use when tidying up around the den. The picnic tables on the left, and the pedestrians on the right should give you an idea of the scale here.



Situated beside the main location of the Denver Public Library is a sculpture of a giant chair, again the right size for our friend, the Convention Center Blue Bear. However, the bear will have to chase its current occupant out of the way first. Standing watch over civic center park, atop the chair, is a horse. Actually, this sculpture is called "The Yearling" by artist Donald Lipski. It is meant to recall the days of childhood, when ordinary things looked monumental. It spent some time in New York's Central Park prior to coming to Denver. Here is what the library's website has to say about it:




The red chair is 21 feet tall and ten feet wide, and the pinto pony is six feet tall at the ears. The scale of this work is meant to recall that time in life when even everyday objects seemed monumental.

“The Yearling” was originally commissioned for an elementary school in upper Manhattan. Says Lipski about this work, “I wanted to give kids something that would really be a cause for wonder.” When the school district asked Lipski to omit the horse, he refused, saying, “It just lost all its magic.” The sculpture spent 1997 in New York City’s Central Park, where it was widely acclaimed before traveling to Denver in 1998 for permanent installation. “If it makes people stop and feel something they haven’t felt before, I’m happy,” commented the artist, shortly before “The Yearling” was moved.

This sculpture was generously donated to former Denver Mayor Wellington E. Webb and the people of Denver by the NBT Foundation.

Finally today, here is an American Indian display located between the library and the art museum. There is a circle of these red objects, all decorated with text and symbols about various events significant to the native American community.

Friday, February 23, 2007

Command Line Spreadsheets

Here is a little trick I have known about since the days when MS-DOS was king. I figured, why not share this. Yes, it is geeky, and rarely needed, but what the heck?

If you ever need to put together a quick and dirty spreadsheet, but don't have any spreadsheet software on your computer, you can still create the file you need. While you can do this very easily in any text editor, such as Notepad, let's get real dirty and pretend you dont have a text editor either. Like Carl Maulden used to say in the old American Express commercials, "What will you do? What WILL you do?"


Here is what you do. In Windows, go to Start > Run and type in cmd in Windows NT, XP, or Vista. In DOS-based Windows, like Win95, 98, or ME, type in command. This will pop up a DOS or DOS-like command line with a C:\> prompt.

The first step is to type copy con filename.csv. Filename can be any valid file name. I used test2.csv for mine. Then hit Enter.

Next, type each row of your spreadsheet, one line at a time, dividing the columns with commas. End each row by hitting the Enter key. You can even use Excel forumulae by simply keeping track of which row and column correspond to the A1-style layout of Excel. My example here shows such formulae.

After you have typed the last row, hold down CTRL and while doing that, type the letter Z (Zee to us contrary Americans, Zed to the rest of the English-speaking world). This will put the end of file character on the last line (^Z), and return you to the C:\> prompt. You can now close the DOS environment by typing exit and hitting Enter. Be sure to notice which folder or directory you are in, so you can find your file back in Windows.
Now, you can send your spreadsheet to someone with Excel. They can either go find your file icon, and if CSV files are linked to Excel, just double click it. Otherwise, they just open Excel and select File > Open, and navigate to your file. Like magic, you have a spreadsheet. You can now format cells, create graphs, and do all of those wonderful spreadsheet things we all know and love.


Sore Loserman, Part II

Yesterday, I wrote about how Senator Allard visited this blog. While I am getting the attention of U.S. Senators, let’s talk for a minute about Connecticut’s own Joseph Lieberman. Joe has had a major fall since he was Al Gore’s running mate in 2000. Remember those GOP stickers after the stolen election of 2000 that parodied the Gore Lieberman bumper stickers, that read “Sore Loserman”? Well Joe is proving them right!

Poor Joe. After he failed to win the nomination of his party to run for re-election, he decided to continue to run as an independent. His feelings were obviously hurt by his fellow Democratic colleagues, who endorsed Ned Lamont, the party’s nominee. After Lieberman’s re-election, he made the rounds of the TV talk shows, obviously with bitterness toward his fellow Democrats who didn’t back him against Lamont, but promising to caucus with them anyway.

Now Joe, being the media whore he is, loves to be on TV and the papers. With control of the Senate hanging in the balance, this whiny man is garnering lots of attention. If he doesn’t get his way, he will switch to the GOP, so take that! He’ll take his marbles and go play with somebody else, and you won’t be his best friend anymore! Boo hoo hoo!!!

Joe, I have a suggestion. Do it! Go! You belong with the Republicans anyway. The day you switch is the last day you have any power, and the last day you get any media attention. The Senate will only be in GOP hands in a tie vote, the Democrats will still control the committees, and the House of Representatives will block any stupid bill from getting to the President’s desk. So do us all a favor and switch already! It’s where you belong.

Of course, the honorable thing to do, would be to resign and rerun in a special election as a Republican. Phil Graham, as much as I detest his politics, did the honorable thing when he switched parties years ago back in Texas, and was re-elected. I won’t say re-elected to his seat, because it isn’t his…it belongs to the voters of his state, just like yours does. However, I suspect you would never risk that.

I’m betting this will be Lieberman’s sword hanging over the heads of the Democrats in the Senate. He loves attention way to much to carry out his threat. He also thrives on the power this gives him. Still Joe, please, go ahead and get it over with. And be sure not to let the proverbial door hit your behind as you turn against the party that has been behind you all those years.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Hello, Senator Allard!

Hi there, Senator Allard. I hope you are enjoying my blog. I am very glad that one of my United States Senators is interested in reading what I have to say. Even though Time magazine last year ranked you as one of the five worst senators, I am glad you care enough to search out my mention of you yesterday. Maybe that proves you have discriminating reading tastes, and you really don't belong on that list. Dang liberal media!! What did you expect, eh?

In any case, I am pretty certain it was you, or one of your staff, digging through the blogosphere to see how you are mentioned. I think this because I have never gotten a visit from the senate.gov domain until I mentioned your name yesterday, and then, this afternoon, there it is. Plus, you didn't enter the blog at the front page, but went directly to the post where you were mentioned.

I know you are a staunch Republican; and I an independently leaning liberal on social issues and more conservative on fiscal ones; but at least you are trying to find out what your constituents think. When I have written you directly, I invariably get a form letter back saying you disagree, but thanks for writing. So welcome to my blog, and please feel free to leave me comments anytime. We disagree on much, but undoubtedly we can agree that liberty is precious and should be protected. Once given away, it is next to impossible to regain.

I urge you to listen to your peers from the other side of the aisle. They didn't win the majority for no reason. The knee-jerk GOP rule our way or the highway doesn't work. Remember the so-called "nuclear option" to eliminate the filibuster? I bet you are glad that one didn't pass!

I will also commend you on keeping your promise to stay for no more than two terms. Sometimes power is addicting, so you have proven your integrity on that issue.

In any case, have a wonderful day, and remember you were sent to represent all of your constituency, not just the far right.

Randy

-----

Below is the record of the Senator's visit to this blog:

Domain Name
senate.gov ? (United States Government)
IP Address
156.33.11.# (U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms)
ISP
U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : District of Columbia
City : Washington
Lat/Long : 38.8933, -77.0146 (Map)
Language
English (United States)
en-us
Operating System
Microsoft WinXP
Browser
Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
Javascript
version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit
Feb 22 2007 4:36:25 pm












Visit Entry Page
http://rktoday.blogs...-what-coalition.html
Visit Exit Page
http://rktoday.blogs...-what-coalition.html

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Coalition? What Coalition?

As the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" crumbles, guess who is left holding the bag in Iraq? Of course, it is the United States. Now that our staunchest ally, the United Kingdom begins to draw down their troops from Iraq, the American administration plows ahead with its troop surge, despite the will of the people and their representatives in Congress.

Tony Blair announced the force red
uction today, which will bring U.K. troops strength in Iraq down to 5000 by the end of summer, with the rest to come out by next year. At their peak, the British forces had over 45,000 troops in that country.

And it is not only the Brits drawing down. Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen is pulling out his nation's 460 combat troops, and will replace them with 50 observers. The coalition as reported by the BBC currently looks like this:



COALITION FORCES
US 132,000
UK 7,100
South Korea 3,200
Poland 900
Georgia 800
Australia 900
Romania 600
Denmark 460
El Salvador 380
Bulgaria 150


Now if all this wasn't depressing enough, the GOP is in full, out of control, spin mode. The administration is gushing about how this is great news, that the Brits have stabilized southern Iraq to the point they can go home. Apparently, U.S. Senator, Wayne Allard, a Republican from Colorado, didn't get the talking points memo. He was just on the local news on KCNC-TV (CBS 4) in Denver, blaming the Democratic-led, non-binding vote against Bush's troop surge for sending the allies a wrong message that America is not committed to winning in Iraq. Wayne, didn't you hear? No blame needed. This is a good thing. Just ask the Decider-In-Chief.

I just have to ask . . . if southern Iraq is secure and can be handed off to Iraqi forces, why don't the British troops go to help with the surge in Baghdad? I guess Blair is finally listening to his constituents. I only wish our President would listen to his.

Monday, February 19, 2007

A High-Flying Merger

Today marked the announcement of the much anticipated merger agreement between satellite radio service providers, XM and Sirius. Under the agreement, Sirius will acquire rival XM for $4.6-Billion in stock. Neither company has yet to turn a profit, and a combination makes a lot of sense. Still, the merger will face opposition by other interests, such as terrestrial radio stations and others who fear a monopoly in satellite radio. The satellite providers say that there is no monopoly, in that they compete with every audio device out there, from iPods to CDs to standard radio.

I am mixed on this one, as I fear subscription prices will rise without the competition between the two; yet both of them are burning through a lot of money competing against each other. Such fears kept the proposed merger of Dish Network and DirecTV from gaining government approval a few years ago, resulting in the breakup of the deal.

So far, I have resisted the siren-call of satellite radio. Still, I would enjoy the variety of programming available on satellite, but I don't really want to pay another $12.95 every month. Terrestrial radio has gotten very homogenized and boring. I used to love listening to distant AM radio stations via atmospheric skip at night, a hobby called "DX-ing". When you hear the same syndicated program on another station that is now owned by Clear Channel Communications, it takes a lot of the fun from the effort.

Once the dust settles, I may yet succumb to the lure of satellite radio. I was once an early adopter. I have had satellite TV for ten years, owned a VCR shortly after they came out, and had a cell phone when they had a handset attached to a backpack-style unit by a cord. I have paid dearly over the years for the privilege of getting technology when it is still new. Circumstances and changing priorities have cured me of that. Things I would like, but are not a priority include not only satellite radio, but High Definition Television, a cell phone that does more than just make calls, and a car GPS navigation system. There was a time in my life when if these things were available, I would have had them. Now, I enjoy my standard definition TV, my plain old flip phone, and listen to AM radio going to work.

I still have satellite TV though. I cannot see going back to the way it was when I was a kid . . . three channels, all in beautiful black and white!

Lights Far & Near



Today has been a warmer and drier day than was expected here in Douglas County. As we get close to 7 PM and the sun beneath the mountains, the temperature is heading down for the night. Still, the partly cloudy skies at dusk cleared just a bit. I went out to watch the deer that come out to find food, and noticed the twilight sky. About 40 degrees or so above the horizon, Earth's closest neighbor, The Moon, was in a crescent phase. Just below it, our next closest neighbor in space, Venus, was shining in the sky.

I braced myself against a pole and shot a few photos. The one above gives a bit of perspective, as the blurred object on the left is the branch of a pine tree, while the dark, cloudy blob in the upper right is . . . a cloud.

In any case, here are some lights a lot closer to home than either The Moon or Venus. The picture below is taken on Mainstreet (yes, Parker spells it as one word) in downtown Parker. The flags are out because today is Presidents' Day. I'm old enough to remember when we had celebrations on February 12 for Lincoln's Birthday; and again on February 22 for Washington's Birthday. Now we lump them together, and I doubt many school children even know why.

A car went by as I was taking this one, so we have what appears to be a very fast car, but instead it is just the trail left by it's taillights during the exposure. It also looks like a motorcycle was coming the other way, because just above the taillight trails, you can see a white streak on the opposite side of the road.

Here's wishing you a very Happy Presidents' Day!

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Pale Blue Dot


I hear the right wing talk radio people continually denigrating the idea that we need to take steps to act against the possibility of global warming. These people claim that humans cannot possibly harm the planet, that we are seeing normal cyclical climate change, and basically let's just use up our resources without regard for our children, grandchildren, and future generations.

Some people who think this way are just ill informed. Others are fundamentalists who are convinced the apocalypse is to happen within their lifetime, so it's okay to abuse the environment; just another danger of extremist religious views. You would think that the Biblical mandates to be good stewards over what God has provided would give these folks a different view. One would think that even if it is proven that we are seeing normal cycles of the climate, that such changes can have catastrophic outcomes for humanity. Yes, the earth will survive, but it could be without our species. Even if one doubts the reality of global warming, is it prudent to ravage and pollute the only place we have to live; our home, the planet Earth.

I am reminded of the profound words of Dr. Carl Sagan, who spoke about seeing a 1990 photo of our planet taken by Voyager I from 6.4-billion kilometers away; a tiny pixel of blue floating like a speck of dust in a sunbeam. These words have been well publicized, but they bear repeating. Dr. Sagan said:

We succeeded in taking that picture [from deep space], and if you look at it, you see a dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there — on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors, so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand. It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.

Words we would all be wise to ponder.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Ike & The Shamrock Hilton

My mention of President Eisenhower in the post below, made me think about a memorable experience back when I was in the first grade at Sutton Elementary School in Houston. This had to be in late 1959 or early 1960, so I was either 6 or 7 years old at the time.

My parents took the family (which at the time was Mom, Dad, me and my two sisters) to the venerable Shamrock Hilton Hotel in the Texas Medical Center to watch the President's motorcade go by. I can still vividly recall standing outside the Shamrock waiting for Ike to come by, and finding my teacher, Mrs. Webb, was there also.

Built in the 1940s as one of Houston's most elegant hotels, The Shamrock Hilton was torn down in 1987 to make room for a parking lot, much to the chagrin of many Houstonians who loved the old landmark, myself included. How sad to lose such a wonderful piece of Houston's recent history, and for a parking lot no less. Its spot near the corner of Holcombe Boulevard and South Main Street has never been the same since.

You can read more about the Shamrock at the Handbook of Texas Online by CLICKING HERE. To read about Sutton Elementary (which is still in operation) CLICK HERE. Interestingly enough, that history of the school even mentions the principal I remember, Raymond Roebuck.

Friday, February 16, 2007

More Bang for the Buck

Just a few miles up the road is Denver, Colorado, home of one of the two United States Mints that are producing the new dollar coins, which were introduced yesterday (the other is in Philadelphia). As you probably know by now, this is a new series of coins featuring the visages of the Presidents of the United States, produced in the order they held office, starting of course with George Washington.

The mint is hoping these new coins will be better received by the public, both as collectible and circulatory currency. The variety of the series raises hopes that they will replicate the popularity of the state quarter program. For collectors, I believe they may be correct. For wider use, I doubt it.

When I was a child, one could occasionally find a Silver Dollar in circulation, along with Mercury dimes, buffalo nickels, and of course, the ubiquitous wheat penny. Then along came the Eisenhower dollar which stuck with the large format of previous dollar coins. But the big change came with the introduction of the much maligned, smaller dollar featuring suffragette Susan B. Anthony.

This coin never caught on outside of a few vending machines and slot machines, because it was similar in size and appearance to the quarter. How many of us accidentally overpaid by using these coins thinking they were quarter dollars?

So, a few years back, the mint came up with the “golden” Sacagawea dollar coin. While easier to distinguish from a quarter due to its hue, it retained the size of the Susie B. coins, making it a direct replacement for vending machines. Yet despite a huge push to garner public acceptance, the Sacagawea dollar never caught on either.

Now we get the golden president dollar coins. I have no doubt collectors will pick them up, but they still have the issues of previous coins when it comes to circulation. Despite being smaller than the old Ike dollars, they are bulkier and heavier in the pocket than paper dollars.

Still, with inflation, I think the dollar coin could be viable. I think the solution is as follows:

  • Stop issuance of the $1 bill and remove them from circulation
  • Flood the market with the $2 bill, as this doesn’t even have the purchasing power the paper buck once had
  • Reformat the $1 coin to be somewhere between the dime and the quarter in size, making it acceptable for pocket change

The third item is unlikely now that the mint has committed to, and started production of, the new presidential dollars. Still, if the first two ideas were implemented, both the $1 coin and the $2 bill would be widely used.

Yes, I have the answer, but alas, the people at the mint never asked my opinion.